OpenSurgery OpenSurgery OpenSurgery OpenSurgery

Sarcoma

Summary

  • Sarcomas are a diverse group of roughly 70 distinct malignant neoplasms of mesenchymal origin that can arise in soft tissue or bone, most commonly presenting as a painless mass [1][2].
  • Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are relatively rare, accounting for about 1% of cancer incidence and 2% of cancer deaths in the United States, with the extremities (especially the thigh) more commonly affected than the retroperitoneum [1].
  • Diagnosis relies on core-needle biopsy planned along the line of eventual definitive resection, and treatment is built around wide surgical excision, often combined with radiotherapy and, in selected settings, chemotherapy, delivered by a specialist multidisciplinary sarcoma team [1][3].
NICE CSG9 · NICE QS78 · BSG Sarcoma Guidelines 2025
  • NICE has no clinical guideline on sarcoma (only a service guideline and a quality standard) so UK clinical practice runs on the British Sarcoma Group guidelines instead.
  • NICE's contribution is CSG9, Improving outcomes for people with sarcoma, a cancer service guideline published in 2006 and last reviewed in October 2014, which covers how services should be organised rather than how patients should be treated.
  • Its five recommendations are that prompt referral for expert diagnosis is crucial; that people should receive treatment from a specialist multidisciplinary team; that treatment should be carried out by specialists; that appropriate support and rehabilitation services should be available; and that all sarcoma teams should collect data on treatment and care and take part in training programmes and audits [4].
  • NICE identified no major studies likely to change those recommendations in the next 3 to 5 years [4].
  • The clinical content comes instead from the British Sarcoma Group UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas, whose 2025 edition updates the 2010 and 2016 versions and, for the first time, adds sections on sarcomas at defined anatomical sites, gynaecological, retroperitoneal, breast and skin [5].
  • The BSG panel explicitly reviewed the NICE, ESMO and NCCN documents and tailored the recommendations for UK practice, providing levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for the key recommendations [5].
  • Its framing statement is that any patient in the UK with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissue sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team [5].

QS78 turns the service guideline into six measurable statements, four of which bear directly on surgical practice: sarcoma advisory groups and MDTs must have referral and diagnosis pathways in place for people with suspected sarcoma; adults, children and young people with bone sarcoma and adults with soft tissue sarcoma must have their care plan confirmed by a sarcoma MDT and treatment delivered by services designated by the sarcoma advisory group; people with a retroperitoneal sarcoma must be referred, before having any treatment, to a sarcoma treatment centre with special expertise in managing that type of tumour; and surgeons performing planned resections of sarcomas must be core or extended members of a sarcoma MDT [6].

Definition

  • Soft tissue sarcomas are malignant tumours originating from mesenchymal tissue, including skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, blood and lymphatic vessels, and other connective tissue of common mesodermal origin, as well as peripheral nerve tumours derived from neuroectoderm [1].
  • Bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, chondrosarcoma) are malignant primary tumours of bone that are rare but occur notably in children and young adults [3].
  • Musculoskeletal tumours encompass both primary and secondary (metastatic) benign and malignant tumours of bone and soft tissue; metastatic carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour found in bone overall [3].

Pathophysiology

  • Sarcomas resulting from identifiable molecular events (point mutations, translocations causing autocrine growth factor overexpression, or oncogenic fusion transcription factors) tend to occur in younger patients with histology suggesting a clear line of differentiation, whereas sarcomas without identifiable genetic changes tend to occur in older patients and show pleomorphic cytology with p53 dysfunction [7].
  • Well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas are driven by amplification of chromosome 12q13-15, upregulating MDM2 and CDK4, while myxoid/round-cell liposarcomas are characterised by the FUS-DDIT3 translocation t(12;16) [1].
  • Ewing sarcoma cells characteristically carry a t(11;22) translocation [3].
  • STS spreads primarily haematogenously (to lungs, liver, bone) rather than to lymphatics, so regional lymph node metastasis is uncommon overall (2–10%), although angiosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma and clear cell sarcoma carry a higher risk of nodal spread [1][2].
  • Carcinomas metastasise to bone haematogenously, and the spine is the third most common site of metastasis after lung and liver, reached in part via the valveless Batson venous plexus permitting retrograde embolic spread; bone metastases may be lytic, sclerotic, or mixed [3].

Molecular pathogenesis in Schwartz's account

  • Schwartz sorts sarcomas into three genetic groups: those with specific translocations or amplification, those with a single defining oncogenic mutation, and those with complex genomic rearrangements; the first two tend to arise in younger patients with a clear line of differentiation, the last in older patients with pleomorphic cytology and p53 dysfunction [8].
  • Translocations occur in 14 subtypes and account for 20–30% (by some estimates over 30%) of sarcomas, producing in-frame fusion oncoproteins that act as transcriptional activators or repressors, EWS-FLI1 in Ewing's sarcoma, EWS-ATF1 in clear cell sarcoma, TLS-CHOP in myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, PAX3-FKHR in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, EWS-WT1 in desmoplastic small round cell tumour, SS18(SYT)-SSX in synovial sarcoma, COL1A1-PDGFB in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, ETV6-NTRK3 in congenital fibrosarcoma and ALK fusions in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, though fusions have been drugged only where they over-express a growth factor or its receptor [8].
  • Amplification of MDM2 drives dedifferentiated liposarcoma, with N-myc, c-erbB2 and ras also implicated and amplification correlating with adverse outcome; GIST is the paradigm of a single activating mutation, most in KIT exon 11 or exon 9 or in PDGFRA, responding dramatically but rarely curatively to imatinib; the largest group, high-grade spindle cell and pleomorphic sarcomas, inactivates Rb and p53, so retinoblastoma survivors and Li-Fraumeni families are at risk and mutant p53 expression correlates with poor survival [8].
  • Neurofibromatosis type 1 (1 in 3000; NF-1 on chromosome 17) adds a 3–15% lifetime malignancy risk including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour and GIST, and 25–50% of MPNSTs carry NF-1 mutations; apart from MPNST in neurofibromatosis, sarcomas do not arise by dedifferentiation of benign soft-tissue tumours [8].

Clinical features

  • Most sarcomas present as a large, rapidly growing, painless mass; other presentations include gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, or neurologic deficit depending on location [2].
  • Warning signs for a soft-tissue tumour needing specialist referral are size greater than 5 cm, increasing size, pain, a location deep to the fascia, and recurrence after previous excision [3].
  • Non-mechanical or night bone pain, particularly around the knee in a young adolescent, is a concerning symptom for a primary bone tumour [3].
  • Retroperitoneal sarcomas typically present in the sixth to seventh decade with vague symptoms such as abdominal fullness or distension; acute pain or obstruction is rare, and up to 50% of retroperitoneal sarcomas measure over 20 cm at diagnosis, with a palpable mass often present on examination [9].
  • Retroperitoneal sarcoma presentation may also include abdominal pain, weight loss, early satiety, nausea, emesis, back or flank pain, paraesthesias and weakness, or the mass may be asymptomatic and incidentally discovered [1].
  • Ewing sarcoma typically presents with a painful mass and may show systemic symptoms including fever, anaemia and raised ESR [3].
  • Bone metastases are most commonly from breast, lung, thyroid, prostate, renal or colon carcinoma (93% of cases), with the spine, proximal femur/pelvis and proximal humerus being the most common sites [3].

Presenting features of a bone tumour

  • Oxford frames bone tumour assessment around a checklist, with the warning that the key to successful management is early detection, and always having a clinical suspicion is essential [10].
  • The features to elicit are pain, persistent, at night, and its response to analgesics; a mass or swelling and its rate of progression; whether a fracture has a history of trauma; neurological symptoms; systemic symptoms; previous tumours, radiotherapy or chemotherapy; and any family history.
  • Oxford's specific caution is to watch for the "red herring history" of trivial injury [10].
  • On examination, the features of the mass are extracted, lymphadenopathy palpated, and three questions asked: is it around a joint, is it deep to the fascia, and what is its size and relationship to surrounding structures [10].
  • Browse's makes the same point about attributed trauma from the patient's side: patients often relate the onset of their symptoms to an injury, but there is no evidence that trauma causes sarcoma, the injury simply focuses their attention on symptoms they had previously dismissed as trivial and insignificant [11].
  • Browse's describes osteosarcoma as occurring in two groups of patients, the young and elderly patients with Paget's disease, and as a highly malignant spindle-cell tumour that spreads locally into the surrounding soft tissues and early and rapidly by the bloodstream [11].
  • Pain is the predominant symptom, usually beginning before the patient notices a lump, and is a persistent ache or throb.
  • General malaise, cachexia and weight loss may precede or coincide with local symptoms, while pulmonary metastases may cause cough and haemoptysis, and abdominal discomfort with jaundice may follow enlargement and destruction of the liver by metastases [11].
  • The most common sites are the lower end of the femur, the upper end of the tibia and the upper end of the humerus, with the overlying skin sometimes reddened and the subcutaneous veins visibly distended [11].
  • For metastatic bone disease, Browse's lists the five primary carcinomas that commonly metastasise to bone as lung, breast, kidney, thyroid and prostate (while noting that any tumour can metastasise to bone) with the first four tending to produce lytic metastases and prostatic deposits often sclerotic [11].
  • The bones most often containing secondary deposits are the vertebral bodies, the pelvic bones, the ribs, and the upper ends of the femur and humerus, because these all contain red bone marrow and have a good blood supply [11].
  • Two clinical cautions follow: some patients develop bony secondary deposits with no signs or symptoms to indicate the site of the primary tumour, and deep-seated bony metastases rarely produce any physical signs except pain on movement and tenderness on percussion [11].
  • Oxford adds that pathological fractures are common, and that a patient admitted with a pathological fracture and an unknown primary should have a full examination to find the source [10].
NICE NG12 · BSG Sarcoma Guidelines 2025

The UK referral pathway for sarcoma runs through imaging, and it differs between bone and soft tissue and between adults and children [12]:

PresentationAction
Adult, unexplained lump increasing in sizeConsider an urgent direct access ultrasound scan (1.11.4)
Adult, ultrasound suggestive of soft tissue sarcoma, or uncertain with persisting clinical concernConsider a suspected cancer pathway referral (1.11.5)
Adult, X-ray suggests possible bone sarcomaConsider a suspected cancer pathway referral (1.11.1)
Child or young person, unexplained lump increasing in sizeConsider a very urgent direct access ultrasound scan (1.11.6)
Child or young person, ultrasound suggestive or uncertain with persisting concernConsider a very urgent referral, for an appointment within 48 hours (1.11.7)
Child or young person, unexplained bone swelling or painConsider a very urgent direct access X-ray (1.11.3); if it suggests bone sarcoma, very urgent referral within 48 hours (1.11.2)

Table reformats the NG12 sarcoma referral criteria [12]. Note the asymmetry: for a child the pathway is a 48-hour one at every step, whereas for an adult the ultrasound is merely "urgent".

  • The BSG records that the older, purely clinical referral criteria failed, and that is why the pathway is now imaging-led.
  • Clinical criteria of a soft tissue mass increasing in size, size over 5 cm, a deep site or pain were incorporated into the original NICE Improving Outcomes Guidance for sarcoma, but those clinical criteria failed to discriminate from much more common benign abnormalities, typically lipomas or cysts, and despite a large increase in direct primary care referrals the percentage of patients who prove to have sarcoma remains low [5].
  • By far the most common soft tissue mass of the limbs and torso seen in primary care is a benign lipoma; atypical lipomatous tumours are manyfold less common and tend to be larger, deep-seated and in the lower limb [5].

The consequence of that diagnostic difficulty is late presentation: the median size of a soft tissue sarcoma at diagnosis remains large, at over 9 cm [5].

Chest wall tumours in Schwartz's account

  • Every chest wall mass is treated as malignant until proven otherwise, since 50–80% are; patients notice a slowly enlarging mass (50–70%), pain (25–50%, commoner and worse with malignancy but present in a third of benign tumours) or both, often only after local trauma; benign tumours average age 26 and malignant 40, and Ewing's sarcoma adds fever and malaise [13].
  • Benign lesions include chondroma (children and young adults, anterior costochondral junction, painless lobulated radiodense mass mimicking costochondritis, resected with a 2 cm margin, or 4 cm when large because well-differentiated chondrosarcoma may hide within), fibrous dysplasia (young adults, posterolateral ribs, expansile with cortical thinning and no calcification, cured by 2 cm excision), osteochondroma (the commonest benign bone tumour, first two decades, from rib cortex near the growth plate, malignant degeneration common in hereditary multiple exostoses where new pain or growth demands evaluation and 4 cm excision), eosinophilic granuloma (osteolytic, children 5–15, solitary in 79% of Langerhans cell histiocytosis bone lesions, painful enough to mimic Ewing's or osteomyelitis, 2 cm resection though it may heal spontaneously) and desmoid tumour (APC/β-catenin and cyclin D1 alterations, Gardner's syndrome, pregnancy, trauma and scars; third to fourth decade; fixed to chest wall but not skin; never metastasises but recurs locally in 5–50% even with negative margins) [13].
  • Chondrosarcoma is the commonest primary chest wall malignancy, arising anteriorly from the costochondral arches as a slow-growing painful low-grade mass with pathognomonic stippled calcification in a radiolucent lesion on CT; osteosarcoma (10–15% of chest wall malignancies, young adults, rapidly enlarging and painful, also after radiation, Paget's disease or chemotherapy) shows a periosteal sunburst and a third present with lung metastases; malignant fibrous histiocytoma (age 50–70, fibroblast-derived) destroys surrounding tissue and bone; liposarcoma (15% of chest wall sarcomas) is a painless low-grade infiltrative mass; fibrosarcoma is a large painful mass; rhabdomyosarcoma is a spindle cell tumour diagnosed by muscle markers; Ewing's sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumours share the t(11;22) translocation and MIC2 expression and present in adolescents with progressive pain without a mass, raised ESR and an "onion-peel" periosteal appearance; and solitary plasmacytoma (25–30 US cases a year, average age 55) causes pain without a mass over an osteolytic lesion [13].

Etiology

  • Most soft tissue sarcomas are sporadic, but recognised causes include germline mutations, radiation exposure and environmental/chemical carcinogen exposure [1].
  • Germline syndromes with increased sarcoma risk include neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1 gene, chromosome 17q11.2; 10% lifetime risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (TP53, chromosome 17p13.1; breast cancer, STS (especially rhabdomyosarcoma and pleomorphic sarcoma) adrenocortical carcinoma, brain cancer, osteosarcoma), familial adenomatous polyposis/Gardner syndrome (APC gene; intra-abdominal desmoid tumours typically arising about 5 years after prophylactic colectomy), Carney-Stratakis syndrome (SDHB/C/D mutations; familial paraganglioma and GIST), familial GIST syndrome (KIT or PDGFRA mutations) and hereditary retinoblastoma (RB1 gene; increased risk of osteosarcoma and other sarcomas) [1].
  • Radiation exposure is linked to unclassified pleomorphic sarcoma, angiosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, osteosarcoma and MPNST; angiosarcoma arising after postmastectomy lymphedema and radiotherapy is termed Stewart-Treves syndrome, with about a 10-year latency [1].
  • Chemical carcinogens linked to hepatic angiosarcoma include Thorotrast (thorium-based contrast, latency 20–30 years), polyvinyl chloride, and arsenic; other recognised risk factors include asbestos (mesothelioma), PVC and arsenic (angiosarcoma), and chronic lymphedema (lymphangiosarcoma) [1][2].
  • Genetic syndromes associated with soft tissue tumours also include tuberous sclerosis (angiomyolipoma) and Gardner syndrome (intra-abdominal desmoid tumours) [2].
  • Osteosarcoma in older patients usually arises in association with Paget disease, osteonecrosis, or after radiotherapy, while conditions carrying high risk of malignant transformation in bone/cartilage include Maffucci syndrome and Ollier disease (enchondromatosis, with malignant transformation to chondrosarcoma in about 20% of Ollier disease and almost inevitable in Maffucci syndrome) [3].

Radiation, chemicals and lymphoedema in Schwartz's figures

Radiation-induced sarcoma, possibly via p53 mutation, is 8–50 times more frequent after radiotherapy for breast, cervical, ovarian, testicular or lymphatic cancer; in 160 cases the commonest histologies were osteosarcoma, pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma, angiosarcoma and lymphangiosarcoma, risk rose with dose and the median latency was 10 years (16 years in a later series of 44, 36% after breast cancer and 34% after lymphoma, with 44% 5-year survival when non-metastatic), and radiation-associated undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma recurs locally more often and kills more than sporadic disease [8]. Phenoxyacetic acid herbicides and chlorophenol wood preservatives raise sarcoma risk; thorium oxide (Thorotrast), vinyl chloride and arsenic cause hepatic angiosarcoma; trauma is not causal but draws attention to a pre-existing mass; and Stewart and Treves described lymphangiosarcoma in chronic post-axillary-dissection lymphoedema in 1948, occurring in 0.07% of axillary dissections, also after filariasis and in congenital lymphoedema, with average survival of 19 months [8].

Diagnosis

  • Imaging before biopsy is essential: MRI is the most informative modality for trunk and extremity STS, with contrast-enhanced CT and ultrasound playing complementary roles, and chest CT should be obtained as the lungs are the most frequent metastatic site [1].
  • The ABSITE account adds a chest radiograph to exclude lung metastases, and MRI before biopsy to exclude vascular, neural or bone invasion [2].
  • Biopsy should be considered before surgical excision of any suspicious soft tissue mass, particularly one larger than 5 cm, fixed, or beneath the muscular fascia; percutaneous image-guided core-needle biopsy is preferred over fine-needle aspiration, which yields insufficient tissue architecture [1][9].
  • The biopsy needle trajectory must be planned so it can be entirely excised within the eventual surgical resection volume, to avoid tumour seeding along the tract [1][2][3].
  • Core needle biopsy is about 95% accurate; if it fails, an excisional biopsy may be used for masses under 4 cm, while a longitudinal incisional biopsy is used for masses over 4 cm [2].
  • Bone biopsies typically use a Jamshidi or other hollow needle, while soft-tissue biopsies use a Trucut needle [3].
  • Misdiagnosis is a recognised risk: 6–10% of cases originally designated sarcoma are not sarcoma, and 14–27% are assigned the wrong histologic subtype, so specimens should be reviewed by an experienced sarcoma pathologist [9].
  • Staging investigations for suspected bone/soft-tissue tumours proceed through three phases: local history, examination, blood tests and plain radiographs; then chest radiograph, bone scan, and abdominal ultrasound; then specialist-centre CT/MRI of the lesion and biopsy [3].
  • Non-mechanical back pain with ESR above 100 mm/h suggests multiple myeloma until proven otherwise, and monoclonal gammopathy or elevated Bence Jones proteins are diagnostic [3].
  • Imaging of the whole affected bone is required to detect satellite lesions (within the reactive zone) and skip metastases (beyond it) [3].
  • For retroperitoneal sarcoma, preliminary workup is contrast CT of the abdomen/pelvis, which aids diagnosis, staging and suggests histologic subtype, with MRI helpful for defining tissue planes and resectability [9].
Computed tomography appearance of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, containing both well-differentiated and dedifferentiated elements
Computed tomography appearance of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, containing both well-differentiated and dedifferentiated elements [1]
BSG Sarcoma Guidelines 2025
  • The BSG makes the biopsy the pivot of the whole pathway, and states three prohibitions around it.
  • The standard approach to establishing a histopathological diagnosis is percutaneous core needle biopsy, with multiple cores taken to maximise diagnostic yield, usually under image guidance by a radiologist [5].
  • The biopsy must be planned so that the biopsy tract can be safely removed at the time of definitive surgery, although the BSG qualifies the received wisdom here: the risk of seeding a metastasis in a biopsy tract is very small, and while placing the biopsy site within skin that will be excised remains good surgical practice, this consideration should not undermine the importance of gaining a pre-treatment histological diagnosis by core biopsy [5].

The three restrictions are: fine needle aspiration is not recommended as a primary diagnostic modality, though it may be considered for confirming recurrence or nodal metastases; incision biopsy would only be necessary in exceptional circumstances and only after discussion in a specialist unit; and any retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal mass with imaging appearances suggestive of soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist MDT before biopsy or surgical treatment [5]. The single exception permitting primary excision is a planned excision biopsy with minimal or no surgical margins for small subcutaneous lesions that are indeterminate on imaging and under 2 cm in diameter, as such lesions usually prove benign; if a very small sarcoma is then identified, a further wide excision of the surgical bed can be undertaken [5].

  • Specialist pathology review is mandated because the error rate without it is high.
  • Discrepancy rates between diagnoses made outside specialist sarcoma centres and those after review by a specialist sarcoma pathologist range from 8 to 11% for major discordance and 16 to 35% for minor discordance [5].
  • Grading uses the FNCLCC system, which distinguishes three malignancy grades based on differentiation, necrosis and mitotic rate, with the caveat that because of tumour heterogeneity and the under-representation of necrosis in small samples, a core biopsy may underestimate tumour grade compared with the final pathology [5].
  • Some subtypes, such as myxoid liposarcoma, cannot be graded by FNCLCC and follow type-specific rules [5].
  • Where a mass radiologically appears highly likely to be sarcoma, additional cores may be taken in specialist centres in England so that fresh tissue can be snap frozen for whole genome sequencing, which the NHS in England currently supports for sarcoma patients, with blood also taken to test for germline variants [5].
  • Imaging is modality-specific by site.
  • Ultrasound is an effective initial triage tool but is highly user dependent, so in the case of diagnostic uncertainty an MRI of the affected region should be performed
  • MRI gives the most accurate information for diagnosis and surgical or radiotherapy planning in the extremity, trunk and pelvis, whereas for retroperitoneal tumours and intrathoracic sarcomas, CT is preferred because it is more convenient and provides complete staging on the same scan [5].
  • For staging, most patients with a confirmed soft tissue sarcoma, and all those with intermediate and high-grade tumours, should have a CT chest to exclude pulmonary metastases before definitive treatment [5].
  • A plain chest radiograph may suffice only for subtypes with very low or negligible metastatic risk, atypical lipomatous tumours, classic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, small atypical fibroxanthoma, or in frail patients where small-volume systemic disease would not change management [5].
  • Four subtype-specific additions apply: regional lymph node assessment for synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, angiosarcoma or epithelioid sarcoma, because of higher nodal risk; routine abdominal and pelvic CT for myxoid liposarcoma, in which soft tissue metastases are more common; and contrast CT or preferably MRI of the brain for alveolar soft part sarcoma and clear cell sarcoma [5]. PET-CT is not yet proven as a routine investigation in sarcoma, though it may be considered before radical surgery such as amputation, and is becoming standard in Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma in younger patients [5].

Working up a chest wall mass in Schwartz's account

  • Serum protein electrophoresis shows a monoclonal spike in plasmacytoma, alkaline phosphatase rises in osteosarcoma and ESR in Ewing's sarcoma; chest radiography shows rib destruction, calcification and, with old films, growth rate; CT defines relations to mediastinum, lung, soft tissue and skeleton, pulmonary metastases and the extraosseous bone formation and destruction typical of osteosarcoma; and MRI's multiplanar imaging better separates tumour from muscle, neurovascular structures and spine and may help distinguish benign from malignant sarcoma [13].
  • Tissue diagnosis comes first, because casual open biopsy can seed the pleural space and compromise cure: experienced pathologists diagnose about 90% of sarcomas by FNA, and needle biopsy avoids cavity contamination; a non-diagnostic needle leads to incisional biopsy placed directly over the mass and oriented for later scar excision, avoiding drains unless a haematoma is likely (drain tract and scar are then excised en bloc); excisional biopsy is reserved for lesions under 2 cm that close primarily, radiologically benign lesions or the classic chondrosarcoma appearance, where definitive resection proceeds directly; desmoids of low cellularity yield poorly to FNA and need open biopsy when over 3–4 cm [13].
  • Plasmacytoma is worked up for systemic myeloma by marrow aspiration, calcium and urinary Bence Jones protein before the solitary diagnosis is accepted [13].

Imaging, biopsy and pathology in Schwartz's detail

  • Lipoma is 100 times more common than sarcoma; new or static superficial lesions under 5 cm may be observed, while enlarging masses, masses over 5 cm or deep to fascia need history, imaging and biopsy, and an extremity sarcoma may present as deep venous thrombosis in a patient without risk factors [8].
  • Imaging precedes any invasive procedure so that swelling or haemorrhage does not confound it: MRI for extremities (heterogeneous, isointense or slightly hyperintense to muscle on T1, heterogeneous and high on T2, with contrast-enhanced T1 gauging necrosis after chemotherapy), CT for retroperitoneum, abdomen and trunk, chest CT for high-grade tumours over 5 cm (radiograph suffices for smaller or low-grade lesions), abdominopelvic CT for myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma and angiosarcoma, total spine MRI for myxoid/round cell liposarcoma, and brain MRI for alveolar soft part sarcoma and angiosarcoma; ultrasound serves when MRI is impossible, for vascular delineation, surveillance and biopsy guidance [8].
  • FDG-PET is not recommended for initial staging, Roberge's 75-patient comparison with chest CT upstaged one patient against two false positives and three indeterminate findings, but grades tumours and gauges chemotherapy response, a 35% or greater fall in uptake after one cycle predicting 95% or more pathological necrosis in 50 patients [8].
  • Fine-needle aspiration (21–23 gauge) is 60–90% accurate for primaries and often cannot give subtype and grade, but is the procedure of choice to confirm metastasis or recurrence; core biopsy is preferred (93% accuracy in Dupuy's 221 musculoskeletal neoplasms, complications under 1%, negligible track seeding, enough tissue for electron microscopy, cytogenetics and flow cytometry, image guidance avoiding necrotic or cystic areas); incisional biopsy is reserved for non-diagnostic cores, done only by the surgeon who will resect, orientated longitudinally on a limb with meticulous haemostasis, poorly orientated biopsies changed the planned operation in 25% of 107 patients and complications reach 17% (haematoma, infection, dehiscence, fungation); excisional biopsy is confined to superficial lesions under 3 cm, never on hands or feet, and after it microscopic residual disease is found in up to 69% of re-excision specimens with 30–40% local recurrence if margins are positive or uncertain, so unknown margins carry the prognosis of positive ones and mandate re-excision including the biopsy tract [8].
  • Expert pathologists disagree on subtype and grade in 25–40% of cases, so morphology is supported by immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, FISH and PCR; metastatic potential is limited in desmoid, atypical lipomatous tumour, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and solitary fibrous tumour, intermediate in the myxoid group (myxoid liposarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma) and high in angiosarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, pleomorphic and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, MPNST, rhabdomyosarcoma and synovial sarcoma; "malignant fibrous histiocytoma" has no distinct gene cluster and has been reclassified, retroperitoneal cases mostly as dedifferentiated liposarcoma, extremity cases as leiomyosarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma or pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma; the report must state diagnosis, site, depth, size, grade, necrosis, margins, nodes, TNM, mitotic rate and vascular invasion [8].
  • Relative frequencies in the French Federation series of 1240 adults were liposarcoma 15%, leiomyosarcoma 12%, unclassified 11%, synovial 10%, MPNST 6%, rhabdomyosarcoma 5%, fibrosarcoma 3%, Ewing's and angiosarcoma 2% each [8].

Scoring and Severity

  • AJCC/UICC TNM staging for soft tissue sarcoma (8th edition) defines T1 as 5 cm or less, T2 as >5 to ≤10 cm, T3 as >10 to ≤15 cm, and T4 as >15 cm, and includes separate site-specific schemas for trunk/extremities, retroperitoneum, head and neck, and abdominal/thoracic viscera, as well as separate systems for GIST, bone sarcoma, uterine sarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans [1].
  • Stage groupings combine T, N (regional node involvement, N1), M (distant metastasis) and histologic grade, with stage largely driven by grade; the two most common grading systems are the French FNCLCC system (based on differentiation, mitotic rate and tumour necrosis) and the NIH system, with FNCLCC preferred by AJCC as it better estimates risk of distant metastasis and survival [1].
  • The Trojani system is also used for grading malignant soft-tissue tumours [3].
  • Sarcoma staging is grade-based rather than size-based for prognosis, and tumour grade is the single most important prognostic factor [2][7].
  • For bone tumours, the Enneking system stages benign lesions as latent, active or aggressive, and malignant tumours by combining local extent (intracompartmental vs extracompartmental) with histologic grade (low-grade intracompartmental IA, extracompartmental IB; high-grade intracompartmental IIA, extracompartmental IIB; any grade with metastases stage III); most primary malignant bone tumours are Enneking stage IIB at diagnosis [3].
  • Surgical resection margins are classified as intralesional, marginal, wide, or radical [3].
  • The Mirels scoring system predicts risk of pathological fracture from bone metastasis using site, pain, size and lesion type, each scored 1–3; a score above 8 indicates high fracture risk warranting prophylactic fixation [3].

Grade, AJCC 8th edition and nomograms in Schwartz's account

  • Grade (the most important prognostic factor) rests on cellularity, differentiation (good, moderate, poor/anaplastic), pleomorphism, necrosis (absent, under 50%, 50% or more) and mitoses per high-power field (under 10, 10–19, 20 or more); metastasis follows 5–10% of low-grade, 25–30% of intermediate and 50–60% of high-grade lesions, the FNCLCC system out-predicts the NCI system with 5-year survival of 90%, 70% and 40% for grades 1, 2 and 3, and AJCC has used three grades since 2008 with grade 1 low and grades 2–3 high [8].
  • The AJCC 8th edition creates subsites (head and neck; extremity and trunk; gastrointestinal; genitourinary; viscera and peritoneum; gynaecological; breast, lung, pleura and mediastinum; other), lowers head and neck size thresholds, splits trunk and extremity T into under 5, 5–10, 10–15 and over 15 cm, abandons the superficial/deep "a/b" distinction introduced in 1998, and returns nodal disease to stage IV because N1 behaves like distant disease, the 7th edition had placed it in stage III since isolated nodal metastasis treated by lymphadenectomy outlives distant metastasis; the system excludes GIST, desmoid, Kaposi's sarcoma and infantile fibrosarcoma, and suspicious nodes are confirmed by FNA or core before radical lymphadenectomy [8].
  • Positive microscopic margin and early recurrence reduce survival, Ki-67, E-cadherin/catenin loss and CD100 predict poorer outcome, and Kattan's Memorial Sloan-Kettering nomogram (age, histology, grade, site, depth, size) predicts 12-year sarcoma-specific survival with validated accuracy, joined by subtype nomograms for liposarcoma, synovial sarcoma and GIST and a retroperitoneal site-specific nomogram [8].

Treatment and Management

  • Multidisciplinary team management at a high-volume sarcoma centre is standard, since up to 74% of patients undergoing an unplanned trunk or extremity sarcoma resection have residual disease at re-resection, and 30-day mortality, limb preservation and survival are linked to high-volume centre care [1].
  • Extremity STS treatment balances local control against limb function; limb-sparing surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy is now standard, replacing routine amputation, based on an NCI trial showing equivalent disease-free and overall survival between limb-sparing plus radiotherapy/chemotherapy versus amputation [1].
  • Adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control and can potentially be omitted only for completely resected T1 extremity STS with negative margins.
  • Radiotherapy may be given pre- or postoperatively, with neoadjuvant radiotherapy offering better tissue oxygenation and a smaller treatment field but a higher rate of wound complications (35% vs 17%), while postoperative radiotherapy carries greater long-term fibrosis and joint stiffness [1].
  • Adjuvant doxorubicin- and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy is considered standard of care for high-grade STS based on meta-analysis showing improved local, distant and overall recurrence, although the survival benefit is modest and guidelines remain guarded in recommending it routinely [1][2].
  • Tumours over 10 cm may benefit from preoperative chemoradiotherapy to allow limb-sparing resection, and about 90% of patients do not require amputation [2].
  • Isolated limb perfusion with hyperthermic chemotherapy (melphalan, TNF-alpha, interferon) is a regional treatment option for locally advanced extremity STS, though supporting evidence is limited [1].
  • Immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors) has shown some benefit in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and alveolar soft part sarcoma but remains under investigation [1].
  • Isolated pulmonary metastases can be resected when feasible, and repeated pulmonary metastasectomy may benefit patients with stable disease; systemic agents for metastatic STS include doxorubicin, dacarbazine, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, docetaxel, eribulin, pazopanib, regorafenib and olaratumab [1].
  • Isolated sarcoma metastases without other systemic disease should be resected when possible, as this offers the best chance of survival; otherwise, palliative radiotherapy is used [2].
  • For retroperitoneal sarcoma, there is no proven benefit of neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the majority of cases, unlike extremity STS, though many centres extrapolate the extremity data and use preoperative radiotherapy for high-grade lesions to reduce dose to viscera and improve resectability.
  • Specific histologic subtypes sensitive to systemic therapy (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, GIST, myxoid round cell liposarcoma) are treated with the appropriate systemic agent [9].
  • Benign bone tumours are usually treated by intralesional curettage; osteoid osteoma is usually treated with CT-guided thermocoagulation [3].
  • Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, whereas chondrosarcoma is not sensitive to chemotherapy or radiotherapy and is managed by surgical excision alone [3].
  • Kaposi sarcoma is managed primarily for palliation: antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is the best treatment for AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma, with radiotherapy or intralesional vinblastine for local disease, interferon-alpha for disseminated disease, and surgery reserved for severe intestinal haemorrhage [2].
NCCN guideline algorithm for management of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma
NCCN guideline algorithm for management of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma [9]
Liquefaction of a high-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma before (A) and after (B) 60-Gy preoperative radiation therapy; subsequent resection showed no viable tumour
Liquefaction of a high-grade retroperitoneal sarcoma before (A) and after (B) 60-Gy preoperative radiation therapy; subsequent resection showed no viable tumour [1]

Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surveillance in Schwartz's detail

  • Schwartz's algorithm: image and core-biopsy any mass that is enlarging or over 3 cm; stage with chest CT for grade 2–3 or T2 tumours; wide excision with 1–2 cm margins suffices for low-grade and T1 lesions; radiotherapy is critical for large intermediate- or high-grade tumours; chemotherapy is considered for locally advanced high-grade or metastatic disease; and isolated local recurrence or resectable metastases are treated aggressively [8].
  • Radiotherapy evidence rests on two randomised trials, NCI (91 patients; 10-year local control 98% with radiotherapy vs 70% without) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering (164 patients; high-grade 5-year local control 89% with brachytherapy vs 66% observed, no difference for low grade), while tumours of 5 cm or less rarely recur locally (Geer's 174 patients gained nothing from postoperative radiotherapy; Karakousis's 80 widely excised and observed patients had 6% recurrence, matching narrower excision plus radiotherapy) [8].
  • Technique uses CT-defined gross tumour volume with a standard 5–7 cm margin (wider over 15 cm), 1.8–2 Gy fractions, 50 Gy in 25 preoperative fractions with resection 4–8 weeks later, or 60–70 Gy postoperatively covering the whole scar and drain sites with clips marking the bed; the Canadian Sarcoma Group trial (190 patients, 50 Gy preoperative vs 66 Gy postoperative) found equal recurrence, wound complications 35% vs 17% (43% lower limb vs 5% upper) and late fibrosis, stiffness and oedema 48% postoperative vs 32% preoperative; overall wound complication rates are 13–37% preoperative against 5–20% postoperative, flap reconstructions fare badly under postoperative irradiation, and functional impairment tracks tumour size, dose over 63 Gy, fields over 35 cm, neural sacrifice, fractures and wound complications [8].
  • Brachytherapy (afterloading catheters 1 cm apart with a 2 cm margin, iridium-192 loaded after the fifth postoperative day delivering 42–45 Gy over 4–6 days) shortens treatment from 4–6 weeks, costs less, suits previously irradiated recurrences and, with staged reconstruction, matches postoperative external-beam wound rates but demands expertise, inpatient stay and bed rest; IMRT spares skin and bone with 94% 5-year local control even for close margins and less oedema and stiffness; definitive radiotherapy for unresectable disease controls 51% of tumours under 5 cm but 9% over 10 cm, doses of 64 Gy or more improve control, and above 68 Gy major complications rise [8].
  • Chemosensitivity is histology-specific, synovial sarcoma, myxoid/round cell liposarcoma and uterine leiomyosarcoma sensitive; pleomorphic liposarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, MPNST, angiosarcoma and desmoplastic round cell tumour intermediate; clear cell, endometrial stromal, alveolar soft part and extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma resistant, so heterogeneous trials show no survival gain; doxorubicin (75 mg/m² 3-weekly first line, maximum six cycles for cardiotoxicity) and ifosfamide (9–10 g/m² second line or first line with cardiac disease; haemorrhagic cystitis, neurotoxicity, renal tubular acidosis; synovial sarcoma especially sensitive) each respond in 20% or more, high-dose or combined regimens 20–60% without survival benefit, and newer agents include gemcitabine (18% alone; 53% with docetaxel in uterine leiomyosarcoma), taxanes for angiosarcoma of face and scalp, trabectedin (leiomyosarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma and translocation sarcomas; neutropenia and hepatotoxicity), albumin-binding aldoxorubicin (superior progression-free survival in a 126-patient phase 2b), palifosfamide (failed in PICASSO III), pazopanib (positive phase 3 second line), bevacizumab (angiosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumour, epithelioid haemangioendothelioma), mTOR inhibitors (PEComa) and the anti-PDGFRα antibody olaratumab, which with doxorubicin raised median survival from 14.7 to 26.5 months (hazard ratio 0.46) [8].
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy remains contested: the 1997 Sarcoma Meta-Analysis Collaboration (1568 patients, 14 doxorubicin trials) improved recurrence-free survival with a non-significant 4% absolute survival gain (7% for extremities), the Italian epirubicin–ifosfamide trial's early benefit (disease-free 48 vs 16 months, survival 75 vs 46 months) evaporated with follow-up, EORTC-62931 (351 patients, ifosfamide 5 g/m² plus doxorubicin) showed 52% relapse-free survival in both arms and better survival in controls (69% vs 64%), the 2008 updates found disease-free benefit without survival (O'Connor, 18 trials, 2170 patients) or a hazard ratio of 0.77 for death (Pervaiz, excluding EORTC-62931), the MD Anderson–Memorial cohort of 674 stage III patients showed benefit only during the first year, and Grobmyer's neoadjuvant series gained most over 10 cm (3-year disease-specific survival 83% vs 62%); three preoperative cycles equal three plus two postoperative, imaging response predicts necrosis, Eilber found ifosfamide raised 95%-necrosis rates from 13% to 48% with local recurrence of 6%/11% versus 17%/23% at 5 and 10 years, and concurrent chemoradiation shortens a sequential programme that otherwise exceeds 6–9 months [8].
  • NCCN surveillance is history, examination and chest imaging every 3–6 months for 2–3 years, then 6-monthly with annual imaging to year 5, plus 6-monthly MRI or CT of the primary site (a discrete T1-low, T2-high, enhancing nodule means recurrence); Whooley's 174 Roswell Park patients showed 18% local recurrence at a median 14 months detected by examination alone in all but one, 57 distant recurrences at 18 months with 36 asymptomatic and found by imaging, chest radiograph positive predictive value 92%, and site imaging ineffective, and many experienced surgeons now image asymptomatic retroperitoneal patients less after a second recurrence [8].

Recurrence and metastasis in Schwartz's account

Up to 20% of extremity sarcomas recur locally, often with metastases, so recurrence demands full restaging; in 179 Memorial Sloan-Kettering patients the median interval was 16 months (65% by 2 years, 90% by 4), 89% had further limb-sparing surgery, 73% adjuvant therapy and 4-year disease-specific survival was 55%, governed by grade, recurrence size and recurrence-free interval; Nori achieved 69% control with re-excision and 45 Gy brachytherapy and Midis limb salvage in 66% with 72% 5-year local recurrence-free survival [8]. Lung is the first metastatic site, with bone 7%, liver 4% and nodes 5–7%; fewer than four nodules, a long disease-free interval and no endobronchial invasion select patients for pulmonary metastasectomy, 15–40% of complete resections survive long term, a 255-patient multi-institutional series gave 38% 5-year survival favoured by clear margins, age under 40 and grade 1–2, and resection is more cost-effective than watchful waiting or chemotherapy; stable isolated liver metastases may be resected, ablated or chemoembolised, chemotherapy outcome is predicted by performance status, prior response, youth, absent hepatic metastases, low grade and long interval, and palliative resection of the primary is judged on symptoms, control, comorbidity, morbidity and metastatic extent [8].

Surgeries

  • Wide local excision with negative margins is the mainstay of curative treatment for extremity and trunk STS.
  • The tumour pseudocapsule is a plane of least resistance but resection along it often leaves involved margins and should be avoided, so a 1–2 cm grossly negative margin beyond the pseudocapsule is traditionally recommended, and re-resection is offered for positive margins on final pathology [1].
  • ABSITE Review similarly recommends 1–3 cm margins (varying with tumour grade) and at least one uninvolved fascial plane where possible, aiming for a limb-sparing operation, with clips placed to mark the site of likely recurrence for later radiotherapy targeting and preservation/reconstruction of motor nerves and vessels; midline incisions are favoured for pelvic and retroperitoneal sarcomas [2].
  • For retroperitoneal sarcoma, surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment; complete en bloc resection is recommended when the mass is resectable (unresectability is usually due to extensive vascular invasion), and enucleation or partial resection is not recommended due to poor outcomes, commonly resected contiguous organs include kidney (32–46%), colon (25%), adrenal (18%), pancreas (10–15%) and spleen (10%) [9].
  • In the retroperitoneal sarcoma literature, because 100% microscopic margin evaluation of large specimens is often impractical, outcomes are usually reported as complete gross resection (R0/R1) rather than confirmed microscopic clearance; complete gross resection was achieved in 80% of initial resections but only 33% at second recurrence and 14% at third recurrence [1].
  • Surgical resection margin classification (bone tumours) is intralesional (through the tumour), marginal (through the reactive zone), wide (outside the reactive zone), or radical (whole anatomical compartment resected) [3].
  • Limb salvage with excision and reconstruction (structural graft or massive endoprosthesis) is possible for the majority of patients with primary malignant bone tumours; only 10–15% require primary amputation (for neurovascular invasion or when reconstruction would be less functional), and limb salvage carries a slightly higher local recurrence rate than amputation but no difference in overall survival [3].
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy has been proposed for epithelioid sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma, but its utility has never been established in a well-designed clinical trial for STS generally [1].
  • Angiosarcoma of the breast is treated by complete excision with negative margins (segmental mastectomy), with no additional benefit from simple mastectomy, and axillary dissection is not routinely indicated given low rates of regional lymphatic spread [7].
  • Surgery for metastatic bone disease is usually palliative; complete resection of solitary metastases in selected patients may offer some survival benefit, though evidence is not strong, and spinal surgery may be needed for stabilisation or decompression when the spinal cord is at risk [3].
  • Preoperative embolisation should be considered for renal metastases given their marked vascularity and risk of massive intraoperative blood loss [3].
Limb-sparing reconstruction after resection of a periarticular bone tumour: distal femur endoprosthesis using press-fit fixation into the femoral canal
Limb-sparing reconstruction after resection of a periarticular bone tumour: distal femur endoprosthesis using press-fit fixation into the femoral canal [1]
BSG Sarcoma Guidelines 2025
  • On radiotherapy, UK practice diverges from the international default in one respect: pre-operative treatment is preferred.
  • Both pre- and post-operative radiotherapy are considered standard approaches for most intermediate or high-grade soft tissue sarcomas, although in the UK pre-operative radiotherapy is more often employed [5].
  • Local control is similar for both, but the toxicity profiles differ: pre-operative radiotherapy is associated with increased acute post-operative complications, while post-operative radiotherapy is associated with increased late toxicity [5].
  • The doses are specified: 60–66 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy fractions post-operatively, and 50–50.4 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy fractions pre-operatively, with surgery approximately 4 to 8 weeks after completion of radiotherapy [5].
  • Two negatives matter: existing evidence does not support a post-operative boost if resection margins are positive, as this is unlikely to benefit and may cause excess late toxicity; and many patients with low-grade tumours will not require radiotherapy at all [5].
  • Two UK trials are cited for technique. VORTEX compared standard two-phase shrinking-field post-operative radiotherapy with a single phase to a smaller volume and found no difference in limb function at two years and no evidence that smaller planning margins improved function, so there was no justification for changing practice to smaller planning volumes [5].
  • The phase II IMRiS trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in limb sarcomas showed a rate of grade 2 or lower soft tissue fibrosis at 2 years of 11.8%, against a 30% historical rate after 3-D conformal radiotherapy [5].
  • Where the sarcoma is unresectable, definitive radiotherapy can provide durable local control at doses over 60 Gy, with a recommended 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks; palliative schedules range from a single 8 Gy fraction to 40 Gy in 15 fractions [5]. Proton beam therapy is commissioned by NHS England, with applications considered by a "Proton Panel", and delivered at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust in Manchester and University College Hospital in London [5].
  • On surgical margins the BSG endorses the planned close margin, which is a departure from the "1–2 cm of normal tissue" rule.
  • The standard procedure is en bloc excision with tumour-free margins, but the minimal adequate free margin depends on histological subtype, pre- or post-operative therapies, and the nature of resistant anatomical barriers, muscular fascia, vascular adventitia, periosteum and epineurium [5].
  • It is therefore acceptable to leave a close or planned microscopic positive margin off a critical structure, supplemented with neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy, with low rates of local recurrence, even for high-grade tumours [5].
  • In some rare situations amputation may still be the most appropriate option to obtain local control [5].
  • The "whoops" procedure has a defined management pathway.
  • Patients who have undergone inadvertent surgery without a pre-operative diagnosis of sarcoma, resulting in unplanned positive margins, should be fully staged and undergo MRI of the surgical bed to look for gross residual disease; in the absence of gross residual disease, re-excision of the surgical bed may be advised if adequate margins can be achieved with acceptable morbidity [5].
  • Where further excision would cause considerable morbidity or is unlikely to clear a contaminated bed (as with deep-seated limb sarcomas or retroperitoneal tumours) observation or radiotherapy may be the alternative [5].
  • Most inadvertent operations are for cutaneous or subcutaneous sarcomas, where further wide excision with or without radiotherapy will usually maintain long-term local control [5].

Retroperitoneal sarcoma is subtype-driven, and the BSG spells out how the operation changes with histology [5]:

SubtypeSurgical strategy
LiposarcomaPoorly defined margins and higher local recurrence risk. An extended approach may improve long-term local control: resect the tumour and adjacent viscera irrespective of involvement, clearing all ipsilateral fat, often necessitating ipsilateral nephrectomy, hemicolectomy, psoas fascia or muscle resection, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy on the left
LeiomyosarcomaMore clearly defined borders, low local recurrence risk after complete resection but higher risk of systemic metastasis. Extended resections will not improve outcomes, which are dictated by metastatic disease; aim for complete resection with involved organs and preservation of adjacent uninvolved organs
Solitary fibrous tumourLow risk of local recurrence; aim for complete resection with negative margins while preserving uninvolved organs. Consider the activity of radiotherapy in pre-operative planning
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of psoasUsually separated from the retroperitoneum by the psoas fascia; remove the whole psoas muscle with the intact tumour, preserving uninvolved nerves and vessels
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumourResect with negative margins, usually involving sacrifice of the nerve of origin

Table reformats the BSG retroperitoneal surgical strategies by subtype [5]. Surgical management must be regionalised within specialist high-volume retroperitoneal sarcoma MDTs, with surgery performed by surgeons experienced in multivisceral extended resections and familiar with subtype-specific behaviour [5].

  • On adjuvant chemotherapy the BSG is candid about why the evidence is weak and how risk stratification rescues it.
  • The lack of clear evidence may be partly explained by heterogeneity in chemotherapy response even between morphologically similar tumours, and there are not yet reliable biomarkers to predict response and therefore benefit [5].
  • The largest adjuvant trial, EORTC 62931, failed to show clear benefit in local control, relapse-free survival or overall survival, but was criticised for a low ifosfamide dose and inclusion of low-risk intermediate-grade patients.
  • Re-analysis stratifying by the Sarculator nomogram showed that patients with extremity or trunk-wall sarcoma and a predicted 10-year overall survival below 51% did benefit, with a halving of the risk of recurrence [5].
  • In the neoadjuvant setting, a randomised comparison of histotype-tailored chemotherapy against anthracycline plus ifosfamide showed no advantage for the tailored approach overall, but in high-risk patients (predicted 5-year survival below 60%) three cycles of anthracycline and ifosfamide gave a 5-year overall survival of 0.66 against 0.55, and outperformed the nomogram prediction of 0.58 [5].
  • The BSG adds the important negative: to date no randomised trial has tested the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy against immediate surgery in operable patients [5].

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour

GIST is driven by activating mutations of the growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase c-kit, present in 95% of these tumours, and in the majority of c-kit-mutated tumours therapy with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib produces a therapeutic response [14].

Surgery remains the primary treatment of localised disease, and the size threshold is 2 cm. All localised GISTs greater than 2 cm should be resected; below that, a risk–benefit discussion about active surveillance versus up-front resection is reasonable, with resection if symptoms develop, new high-risk features appear, or the tumour progressively enlarges [15].

The margin philosophy differs from most sarcoma surgery. The goal is complete resection with microscopically negative (R0) margins and maximal organ preservation, but where R0 cannot be achieved, microscopically positive (R1) margins may not confer a worse prognosis, and per NCCN guidance such patients should not undergo re-resection to obtain clear margins, being followed with active surveillance instead [15].

  • Two intraoperative points carry disproportionate weight.
  • Rupture of the tumour capsule must be avoided because it seeds the peritoneum with tumour cells, and the peritoneum should be inspected at resection to assess peritoneal or hepatic spread [15]. Lymphadenectomy is not routinely required, since most GISTs rarely spread through lymphatics; it is reserved for specific cases such as SDH-deficient or gene fusion-positive tumours with lymphadenopathy [15].
  • Gastric GISTs are managed by wedge resection or partial, distal or total gastrectomy according to size and site, though total gastrectomy is rarely needed, particularly where neoadjuvant imatinib is used [15].
  • Schwartz's molecular and trial detail: GISTs resemble the interstitial cells of Cajal, express CD34 and c-Kit (CD117), occur at 6–15 per million per year, arise in stomach (60%, better prognosis) and small bowel (30%), and carry KIT mutations in about 80% and PDGFRA in 5–10%, wild-type morphology-typical tumours still qualifying; exon 11 KIT mutations respond better than exon 9 or wild-type (83.5% vs 47.8% in phase 2, confirmed in EORTC-62005), contrast spiral CT stages liver and peritoneum (the two metastatic sites), PET detects early imatinib response if a baseline is obtained, and Choi's CT criteria substitute [8].
  • Complete resection without wide margins, anatomic resection or lymphadenectomy is standard; 5-year survival is 20–44% overall and up to 75% after complete early resection, DeMatteo's 200 patients had 54% disease-specific survival after gross complete resection and 20 months median survival when metastatic, and risk is stratified by size and mitoses (under 5, 5–10, over 10 per high-power field) by the NIH criteria and, adding site, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology table [8].
  • Imatinib produced 53% partial responses in the EORTC phase 1, 54% objective response in the 147-patient 400 vs 600 mg trial (14% progression; 21% grade 3–4 events including 5% gastrointestinal bleeding from rapid mural necrosis), FDA approval in February 2002, equivalent response and survival at 400 and 800 mg/day with more toxicity at 800 in the 746-patient Intergroup and a parallel phase 3, so escalation to 800 mg is reserved for progression or exon 9 mutation; stopping after 1 year cut progression-free survival from 18 to 6 months, so treatment continues without progression; primary resistance (within 6 months; exon 9, PDGFRA exon 18 or wild-type) and secondary resistance (after 6 months of response) are managed by escalation or sunitinib (VEGFR, PDGFRA, KIT, FLT3; time to progression 27.3 vs 6.4 weeks; hand–foot reaction, hypertension, cardiotoxicity, hypothyroidism; approved 2006), then regorafenib (79% clinical benefit and 10-month progression-free survival in phase 2; 4.8 vs 0.9 months in phase 3), with sorafenib, dasatinib and nilotinib afterwards; resection of isolated progression or of residual disease responding to imatinib yields progression-free survival in 70–96%, though timing is undefined [8].
  • Adjuvant imatinib: ACOSOG Z9001 (12 months vs placebo after resection of tumours of at least 3 cm) improved recurrence-free but not overall survival, giving FDA approval in 2008; SSGXVIII/AIO in high-risk GIST (over 10 cm, more than 10 mitoses per 50 fields, over 5 cm with more than 5 mitoses, or rupture) showed 36 months beat 12 (5-year recurrence-free survival 65.6% vs 47.9%, overall 92% vs 81.7%), so NCCN and ESMO advise imatinib for intermediate or high risk with at least 36 months for high risk, treating all with 30% or higher recurrence risk and a sensitive genotype, none with 10% or less, and 10–30% case by case; KIT exon 11 and non-D842V PDGFRA mutations are sensitive, exon 9 is treated (perhaps at 800 mg), and PDGFRA D842V, NF1-associated wild-type and paediatric/Carney-Stratakis GISTs are not treated [8].
  • Preoperative imatinib for marginally resectable or high-morbidity tumours continues to maximal response or progression, stops immediately before surgery and resumes with oral intake; RTOG 0132/ACRIN 6665 (600 mg for 8–10 weeks then 24 months) gave 2-year progression-free survival of 83% for primary and 77% for recurrent disease and a 3–7-day preoperative trial 69% PET response with 46 months median disease-free survival; a radiological response within a month implies a favourable genotype, bulky tumours and those at oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction, duodenum or distal rectum are downstaged to allow local excision or laparoscopy, and resection is best at 6–12 months or when shrinkage plateaus, before secondary resistance [8].

Desmoid, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and paediatric sarcoma in Schwartz's account

  • Desmoids are not sarcomas but are locally aggressive and never metastasise; half arise in extremities, abdominal wall lesions follow pregnancy, FAP-associated cases (Gardner's syndrome) carry germline APC and sporadic cases CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutations; local recurrence reaches a third regardless of margins while two-thirds with positive margins never recur, so function-sparing surgery accepting a positive margin on critical structures, or observation with surgery only for progression (sparing up to 50% any operation), is favoured, with radiotherapy to 50–54 Gy for unresectable or recurrent disease (mindful of induced sarcoma), tamoxifen and NSAIDs acting on β-catenin signalling, and methotrexate–vinblastine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or sorafenib for symptomatic failures (imatinib unconvincing) [8].
  • Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (4.2 per million a year, 6.5 in blacks vs 3.9 in whites, 40% on the trunk) is a slowly growing dermal nodule with satellites when large, driven in over 90% by the t(17;22) COL1A1-PDGFB fusion activating PDGFR, treated by wide excision with under 10% recurrence in expert series (30–50% in population series yet over 99% 5-year survival) and, when locally advanced, FDA-approved imatinib [8].
  • Paediatric sarcomas (7–8% of childhood cancer, about 600 a year) split into rhabdomyosarcoma, the commonest soft-tissue tumour under 15, sited genitourinary 24%, extremity 20%, head and neck 20%, parameningeal 16%; embryonal 70% (11p15.5 allelic loss) and alveolar 20% (t(2;13) in 85–90%, t(1;13) in 10%); staged by the Intergroup surgical-pathological groups, extent being the strongest predictor; complete resection when function and cosmesis allow gives group I–II survival near 90% with less chemotherapy, chemotherapy-guided local treatment in MMT84 spared 66% radical surgery and radiotherapy with 46% survival after salvage of relapse; nodes involved in 20–30% at extremity, paratesticular and prostatic sites so sampling or sentinel mapping is used; 15–20% metastatic at presentation (lung 40–50%, then marrow and bone) but all are treated as micrometastatic with vincristine, dactinomycin and cyclophosphamide, radiotherapy for group II, and 5-year disease-free survival of 65% overall (84%, 74%, 62% and 23% for groups I–IV), and non-rhabdomyosarcoma sarcomas (60%; synovial, MPNST and fibrosarcoma commonest, none over 15%), managed like adult tumours with surgery, radiotherapy for large high-grade lesions and an unclear role for chemotherapy [8].

Chest wall resection and reconstruction in Schwartz's account

  • Chest wall sarcomas fare worse than extremity or head and neck sarcomas, and in 8249 registry cases risk of death rose with age over 70 (HR 1.54), non-Caucasian race, MFH and leiomyosarcoma histology, trunk or retroperitoneal site, regional (1.58) or distant (2.90) stage and absence of surgery (1.56) [13].
  • Osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, PNET and Ewing's sarcoma are chemosensitive and receive preoperative chemotherapy then resection and postoperative chemotherapy (induction also allowing resection of primary and lung metastases in osteosarcoma); non-metastatic MFH, fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma and synovial sarcoma go straight to resection and reconstruction; metastatic soft tissue sarcoma has chemotherapy then resection if indicated, since lung or soft tissue involvement does not preclude surgery and resected patients survive a median 25 months against 8 without [13].
  • Except for rhabdomyosarcoma the primary treatment is wide resection with 4 cm margins and reconstruction; chondrosarcoma is insensitive to radiation and chemotherapy and any likely low-grade anterior chondrosarcoma is resected with 4 cm margins after excluding lung and bone metastases, giving 60–80% survival at 5–10 years for low-grade tumours; desmoids are excised with 2–4 cm soft tissue margins and frozen-section control, typically taking the involved ribs plus one above and below with 4–5 cm of rib, accepting under 1 cm only to spare a major neurovascular structure since margins under 1 cm greatly increase recurrence, and survival with negative margins is 90% at 10 years; liposarcoma recurrence is re-excised with occasional radiotherapy; fibrosarcoma survives 50–60% at 5 years; over two-thirds of MFH patients recur or metastasise; Ewing's survival is 50% or less at 3 years, falling with size, and is treated by chemotherapy, radiotherapy and resection of residual disease with maintenance chemotherapy; plasmacytoma is biopsied only and treated with 40–50 Gy, though up to 75% develop myeloma with about 20% 10-year survival [13].
  • Margin status determines recurrence and survival, so en bloc resection takes involved ribs, sternum, superior sulcus or spine with at least one normal rib above and below, intervening intercostal muscles and pleura, overlying pectoralis, serratus or latissimus when needed, adjacent lung in continuity, the whole sternum with adjacent cartilage for sternal tumours, partial sternectomy for anterior lesions and partial vertebrectomy for posterior lesions involving rib heads, respiratory support now being good enough that ventilation concerns should not compromise the resection; large defects are reconstructed at the same operation by a thoracic and plastic surgical team with a 2 mm Gore-Tex patch (impervious to fluid, so fewer seromas, and rigid when taut) or a double-layer polypropylene mesh–methylmethacrylate sandwich, mild paradox being tolerable over small areas, and covered with latissimus dorsi, serratus anterior, rectus abdominis or pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps [13].

Wide excision, amputation and regional perfusion in Schwartz's detail

  • The 1985 NIH consensus endorsed limb-sparing surgery for most high-grade extremity sarcomas, amputation remaining for the under 5% whose tumours cannot be grossly resected with function preserved; wide local excision removes the biopsy site with about 1–2 cm of normal tissue (narrower to spare uninvolved neurovascular structures, acceptable with radiotherapy), dissects through planes not abutting the tumour, never enucleates along the pseudocapsule of compressed reactive tissue (which contains microscopic disease), strips adventitia or perineurium from displaced vessels and nerves rather than resecting them, may extend to compartment resection for massive tumours, and clips the bed for radiotherapy; en bloc resection with vascular reconstruction and resection of sciatic, tibial or peroneal nerves with reconstruction give recurrence and survival matching lesser operations at higher complication rates, bone invasion (about 5%, prognostically adverse) requires bone resection while periosteum is an adequate margin without cortical penetration, and hand and foot tumours recur in 32% after limited surgery alone but do well with limited surgery plus radiotherapy, flaps, tendon transfers and bone or vascular repair; patients expecting a difficult recovery fare worse, so preoperative education and immediate physiotherapy are standard [8].
  • Historically local excision of large high-grade sarcomas failed in 50–70%; the NCI randomised comparison (1975–1981) found no survival or recurrence difference between amputation and limb-sparing surgery plus radiotherapy, and Potter's review of 123 conservative versus 83 amputation patients showed 8% vs 0% local recurrence with equal survival [8].
  • Suspicious nodes are confirmed by ultrasound-guided FNA or core before radical lymphadenectomy, which improves survival for isolated nodal disease; sentinel node biopsy lacks prospective validation and belongs in trials or highly selected patients [8].
  • Isolated limb perfusion isolates the external iliac (thigh), femoral or popliteal (calf) or axillary (arm) vessels, ligates collaterals, cannulates onto a pump oxygenator under tourniquet or Esmarch, circulates melphalan with TNF-α (unlicensed in the United States, used in Europe) for 90 minutes at 40°C while monitoring leak with technetium-labelled albumin and a precordial counter; McBride's 1974 series of 79 (melphalan and dactinomycin) gave 57% 5-year survival with 13 amputations, Lienard's 1992 100% response with TNF-α, interferon-γ and melphalan revived it, Eggermont's 186-patient European study achieved 82% response, 29% complete response and 82% limb salvage in amputation candidates, whereas Fraker's American series had 26% complete and 30% partial responses with 32% amputated, and reported response rates span 18–80% with 50–70% 5-year survival, never compared directly with conventional treatment; Moffitt's percutaneous, normothermic, acidotic isolated limb infusion with melphalan and actinomycin-D is repeatable, avoids iliac dissection and gave 58% response and 78% limb salvage at 21 months [8].

Retroperitoneal, gastrointestinal, breast and uterine sarcoma in Schwartz's account

  • About a third of retroperitoneal tumours are sarcomas (about 1000 a year in the United States, 10–15% of adult sarcomas, two-thirds high grade, liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma commonest, 70% over 10 cm); work-up excludes lymphoma (fever, night sweats, LDH) and germ cell tumour (testicular examination, β-hCG, AFP), contrast CT defines extent, vascular relations, liver, peritoneum and renal function and often distinguishes well-differentiated from dedifferentiated liposarcoma, chest CT is mandatory since 11% present with synchronous metastases, and a negative core should not delay surgery when imaging shows well-differentiated liposarcoma [8].
  • Complete resection, sacrificing colon, kidney, spleen, pancreas, psoas, small bowel, cava or aorta as needed, vascular resection carrying 36% morbidity, 4% mortality and over 88% patency in 25 patients, is the only effective treatment, surgery being marginal even when macroscopically complete so involved organs are resected liberally at high-volume centres; in 500 Memorial Sloan-Kettering patients median survival was 103 months after complete resection against 18 months after incomplete resection or observation, debulking is justified only for atypical lipomatous tumours (palliation and possible survival benefit), not for dedifferentiated or other high-grade tumours, and resection is not offered without imaging evidence of resectability except to palliate obstruction, pain or bleeding [8].
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown no survival benefit; preoperative radiotherapy (definable borders, viscera displaced from the field, lower doses) to 50 Gy is considered for large high-grade or recurrent low-grade tumours and postoperative radiotherapy discouraged unless the bed lies clear of dose-limiting structures, ACOSOG Z9031 closed for poor accrual in 2006 and the EORTC STBSG trial continues; retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma spreads to liver, sarcomatosis can follow, resectability falls from 57% at first recurrence to 20% at second and 10% at third, and up to 25% of well-differentiated liposarcomas recur dedifferentiated [8].
  • Gastrointestinal sarcomas present with bleeding (44%), mass (38%) and pain (21%), lack the nodal enlargement of a comparable adenocarcinoma, are best biopsied endoscopically with EUS for gastric lesions, and are resected with 2–4 cm margins without lymphadenectomy, segmental resection with mesentery for jejunum, ileum and colon, transanal excision for small low rectal lesions, en bloc multivisceral resection for invasive gastric leiomyosarcoma, whereas GIST needs only a gross negative margin and rarely total gastrectomy [8].
  • Breast sarcoma is under 1% of breast malignancy and under 5% of sarcomas, half angiosarcoma increasingly after breast irradiation (latency 3–20 years, incidence 0.3% at 10 and 0.5% at 15 years; patients 30 years older and less often metastatic than radiation-naive cases; erythematous patches, papules, bluish-black or bruise-like lesions needing punch or incisional biopsy since mammography is non-specific); phyllodes tumours are not sarcomas though infiltrating margins, stromal overgrowth, atypia and cellularity predict metastasis; treatment is complete excision with negative margins, mastectomy adding nothing when segmental excision suffices, no routine axillary dissection, and neoadjuvant therapy for large high-risk tumours [8].
  • Uterine sarcomas (under 5% of uterine malignancy; 5-year survival 30–50%) comprise leiomyosarcoma (35–40%; peak 50–60 though possible in the twenties; hysterectomy with ovarian preservation optional, nodes under 5% so no lymphadenectomy, gemcitabine–docetaxel 53% response, doxorubicin and trabectedin active), endometrial stromal sarcoma (7–10%; graded by mitoses above or below 10 per 10 fields; progesterone-receptor positive so hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, no HRT, antioestrogens for recurrence but not tamoxifen, which may be pro-oestrogenic), carcinosarcoma (50%; epithelial, treated as ovarian or endometrial cancer) and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (receptor-negative, poor prognosis, hysterectomy and pelvic radiotherapy); randomised postoperative pelvic irradiation gave no survival benefit [8].

Complications

  • Excision of high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas with adjuvant or preoperative radiotherapy carries a risk of wound-healing complications, and preoperative (neoadjuvant) radiotherapy is associated with a higher rate of postoperative wound complications than postoperative radiotherapy, while postoperative radiotherapy carries greater long-term fibrosis and joint stiffness [1][3].
  • Massive endoprosthetic reconstruction of a limb after bone tumour resection carries risks of infection, instability, and wear or loosening of the prosthesis [3].
  • Resection requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy, major vascular resection, or splenectomy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is more likely to cause a major postoperative complication, though this does not appear to adversely affect long-term survival or recurrence [1].
  • Osteochondromas can cause mechanical symptoms, nerve impingement, vascular pseudoaneurysm, fracture and infarction, with malignant transformation risk under 1% for solitary lesions and 1–3% for multiple hereditary exostoses [3].
  • Pathological fracture is a recognised complication of both benign (e.g., simple bone cyst, aneurysmal bone cyst) and malignant bone lesions [3].

Prognosis

  • Tumour grade is the most important prognostic factor for sarcoma survival, both overall and in the absence of systemic metastases [2][7][16].
  • For extremity STS, tumour grade is the most important predictor of distant metastasis, with only 43% metastasis-free survival in high-grade tumours; other predictors include tumour size, bone/neurovascular involvement, tumour depth and histology [1].
  • Overall sarcoma prognosis is poor, reported as 40% five-year survival with complete resection, hampered by delay in diagnosis, difficulty achieving total resection, and difficulty delivering radiotherapy to pelvic tumours; chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not been shown to change overall survival for STS as a whole [2].
  • Retroperitoneal sarcoma carries an especially poor prognosis due to delayed diagnosis and incomplete resection, and difficulty delivering radiotherapy near vital structures; the ability to completely remove the tumour is the most important prognostic factor, and lymphoma (the most common retroperitoneal tumour overall) must be excluded [2].
  • Retroperitoneal sarcoma prognosis is most strongly influenced by resection status (R0/R1/R2), tumour grade and histologic subtype: overall five-year survival after complete resection is 54%, but 74% for grade 1 versus 24% for grade 2–3 disease.
  • Patients with positive margins have a median survival of about 18 months, equivalent to unresected patients, while unresectable disease carries a median survival of 10 months even with optimal chemoradiotherapy [1][9].
  • Even after apparently complete resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma, recurrence is common (40–91% in various series), and risk does not plateau over long-term follow-up, so lifelong surveillance is recommended [1][9].
  • Myxoid liposarcoma has a relatively favourable 10-year disease-specific survival of 87%, whereas the round-cell variant has distant metastasis rates up to 21%, and pleomorphic liposarcoma has a poor prognosis with no known targetable mutations [1].
  • A prolonged disease-free interval between initial STS treatment and development of lung metastasis is a favourable prognostic factor [1].

Schwartz's headline figures

Sarcomas are under 1% of adult cancers (about 10,000 a year in the United States) but 15% of childhood cancers, comprise over 50 subtypes, arise two-thirds in the extremities, carry 50–60% 5-year survival across all stages (over 70% with over 90% local control for extremity tumours under multidisciplinary care at high-volume centres), and kill through lung metastases that appear within 2–3 years of diagnosis in 80% of cases [8]. High-risk patients are those with metastases at presentation, non-extremity primaries, or intermediate- or high-grade tumours over 5 cm [8].

References

  1. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 22nd ed., Ch. 64 Sarcomas of the Soft Tissues, Retroperitoneum, and Bone
  2. The ABSITE Review, 2022, Ch. 6
  3. Bailey & Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 28th ed., Ch. 42 Musculoskeletal tumours
  4. NICE Cancer Service Guideline CSG9: Improving outcomes for people with sarcoma (2006, last reviewed October 2014), Overview; Recommendations www.nice.org.uk
  5. Gronchi A, Jones RL, Strauss DC, et al., on behalf of the British Sarcoma Group: UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Br J Cancer 2025 (update of the 2010 and 2016 guidelines), Biopsy; Chemotherapy; Classification of margins; Clinical presentation; Definitive radiotherapy; Histology; Imaging, diagnostic; Imaging, patient staging; Introduction; Key recommendations; Methodology; Palliative radiotherapy; Proton beam therapy; Radiotherapy; Retroperitoneal sarcomas; Surgery pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. NICE Quality Standard QS78: Sarcoma (2015), Quality statement 1; Quality statement 2; Quality statement 4; Quality statement 5 www.nice.org.uk
  7. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery: ABSITE and Board Review, Ch. 36 Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  8. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed., Ch. 36, Soft Tissue Sarcomas
  9. Maingot's Abdominal Operations, 13th ed., Ch. 18
  10. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Surgery, 5th ed., Ch. 16 Orthopaedic surgery
  11. Browse's Introduction to the Symptoms and Signs of Surgical Disease, 6th ed., Ch. 6 Bones, joints, muscles and tendons
  12. NICE Guideline NG12: Suspected cancer: recognition and referral (2015, updated 2026), 1.11.1; 1.11.2; 1.11.3; 1.11.4; 1.11.5; 1.11.6; 1.11.7 www.nice.org.uk
  13. Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 11th ed., Ch. 19, Chest Wall, Lung, Mediastinum, and Pleura
  14. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 22nd ed., Ch. 60
  15. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 22nd ed., Ch. 65
  16. The ABSITE Review, 2022, Ch. 11